Coast Guard EER Supporting Remarks
Competency-aligned supporting remarks for enlisted evaluations.
Details
What did they do?
EER supporting remarks that follow the rules
Coast Guard enlisted evaluations use competency-aligned supporting remarks, and the comment rules in COMDTINST M1000.2C are stricter than most services expect — including the requirement to avoid names and gendered pronouns in remarks. Each remark should evidence the competency with a specific, quantified example.
The generator writes remarks for the military, performance, professional-qualities, and leadership competency groups from your rough notes, in the correct impersonal style. Verify each remark against the current manual and your command's evaluation guidance.
Frequently asked questions
Why can’t EER remarks use names or gendered pronouns?
COMDTINST M1000.2C requires impersonal comment style in enlisted evaluation remarks — no names or gendered pronouns — so remarks describe the member’s performance neutrally. The generator writes in that style automatically.
How should each supporting remark be structured?
Tie one specific, quantified accomplishment to the competency being supported: the action, its scope, and the measurable result, kept within the character budget for the block.
What competency areas does this cover?
Military (bearing and customs), performance, professional qualities, and leadership — one remark block per area, each sized to fit the evaluation form.
Official source
COMDTINST M1000.2C — U.S. Coast Guard Directives — The Military Assignments and Authorized Absences / personnel manuals are published through the Coast Guard directives system.